Footprint Charts: Reading Institutional Intent
🎯 What You'll Learn
By the end of this lesson, you'll be able to:
- Footprint charts display volume traded at each price level INSIDE each candle, split by bid/ask side
- Absorption pattern: Large buy volume at specific price, price barely moves down = strong hands defending level (bullish)
- Exhaustion pattern: Large sell volume, price drops fast = no one buying, weak hands panicking (bearish reversal coming)
- Framework: Watch footprint at key levels → Absorption = enter in that direction → Exhaustion = fade the move
⚡ Quick Wins for Tomorrow (Click to expand)
Don't overwhelm yourself. Start with these 3 actions:
- Enable footprint chart on your platform — Most platforms (TradingView, Bookmap, Sierra Chart, NinjaTrader) have footprint/volume imbalance tools. Add it to ES or NQ chart. Just observe one session—no trading yet.
- Spot ONE stacked imbalance — Watch for 3+ consecutive price levels with same-sided imbalances (e.g., all bullish 3:1 ratios). Mark it on the chart. Did price continue (absorption) or reverse (exhaustion)?
- Track POC for 30 minutes — Watch how the highest-volume price (POC) shifts bar-to-bar. Is it climbing (bullish), descending (bearish), or stationary (balanced)? Compare POC direction to price movement.
Candlesticks show you WHAT happened. Footprint charts show you WHO made it happen—and WHY.
📊 Candlestick vs Footprint: The Same Bar, Two Different Stories
- Green candle = bullish
- Price up $0.75
- Volume: 8,200 contracts
- Looks like buying pressure
- Total delta: -1400 (net selling!)
- Heavy selling at $99.50-$100.00
- Light buying at top
- ⚠️ TRAP—distribution, not accumulation
The candlestick says "bullish green candle up $0.75." The footprint reveals net SELLING of 1,400 contracts inside that same green candle. Price rose because sellers stepped aside at the top, NOT because buyers were aggressive. This is exactly how retail gets trapped buying distribution tops. The footprint tells the truth candlesticks hide.
Every price level has two sides: buyers and sellers. But standard candlesticks hide the war happening inside each bar. Did price rise because buyers were aggressive, or because sellers disappeared? Did that "bullish engulfing" candle form on heavy buying or light volume? Footprint charts reveal the truth.
At its core, a footprint chart displays the exact volume traded at each price level, broken down by aggressor side (market orders hitting the bid or lifting the ask). When you see 5,000 contracts bought at $100.00 but only 500 sold, that's not random—that's institutional absorption. Smart money accumulating while retail sells into "resistance."
🚨 Real Talk
Footprint charts are the closest thing retail traders get to seeing institutional order flow. Stacked imbalances reveal absorption zones where institutions silently build positions. POC migration shows repositioning patterns invisible on candlesticks. Divergence between price and footprint volume screams trap. This is next-level market reading—and once you see it, you can't unsee it.
🎯 Key Insights You'll Master
- Footprint Architecture: How bid/ask volume at every price reveals aggressor intent and institutional positioning patterns
- Stacked Imbalances: Multi-level order flow patterns that differentiate absorption (continuation) from exhaustion (reversal)
- POC Migration Analysis: Tracking highest-volume price levels as they shift reveals where institutions are repositioning
- Volume Divergence Signals: When price makes new highs/lows but footprint volume disagrees—the ultimate trap detector
- Real Trade Integration: Combining footprint signals with market structure for high-probability potential entry timing
Real-World Example 1: Derek's $28K "Ignoring Divergence" Disaster
Derek's pattern (12 trades, 0% win rate, -$28,340): Learned footprint mechanics but ignored divergence signals. Every trade had clear warnings—price said "BUY," footprint said "TRAP."
The pattern repeated 12 times:
- Price action: New highs, breakouts, "momentum" (looked bullish)
- Footprint reality: Volume declining 40-60%, negative delta, POC not following price
- Derek's mistake: Focused on price, ignored volume divergence
- Result: Bought distribution tops, stopped out 12/12 times
Examples:
- Mar 11 (SPY): New high $520. Footprint showed volume DOWN 40%, delta -$18M (selling). Derek: "Bullish!" Stopped. -$1,840.
- Mar 15 (NVDA): ATH $920. POC at $915 (institutions NOT participating at highs). Derek: "Breakout!" Stopped. -$3,180.
- Mar 29 (AAPL): Breakout $177. All volume at BID (no ask absorption = no buyers). Derek: "Finally!" Trapped. -$2,300.
The Fix: Derek's Divergence Rules
What would have saved $28K:
- Volume divergence: If volume drops >30% on new high, NO TRADE (would have skipped 8/12)
- Delta confirmation: Breakouts need POSITIVE delta, negative = fade (would have skipped 7/12)
- POC migration: If POC lags price >2 pts, institutions not participating, NO TRADE (would have skipped 6/12)
- Exhaustion pattern: 3+ bid imbalances at resistance = fade, don't follow (would have skipped 5/12)
The Recovery (Apr-Sept 2024)
Derek's new approach: Created divergence checklist—ALL must pass before entry:
- ✓ Volume INCREASING on new highs
- ✓ Delta POSITIVE on breakouts
- ✓ POC FOLLOWING price
- ✓ Imbalances = ABSORPTION (support), not EXHAUSTION (resistance)
5-month results:
- Account: $36,660 → $61,200 (+67%)
- 43 trades, 35 winners (81% win rate vs 0% before)
- Avoided 28 setups due to divergence (saved $18K+ in prevented losses)
🎯 Derek's Core Lesson
"I spent 2 months learning HOW to read footprints but never learned WHAT THEY MEANT. Divergence means 'TRAP—STAY OUT.' Every one of my 12 losses had screaming divergence. Now when footprint and price disagree, I believe the footprint 100% of the time. Win rate went from 0% to 81%. The footprint was always right—I was just too stubborn to listen."
Part 1: Footprint Chart Architecture
What Is a Footprint Chart?
A footprint chart decomposes each candlestick into its component price levels, showing the volume traded at each price separated by aggressor side. Instead of seeing just OHLC (open, high, low, close), you see the battlefield.
Standard Candlestick View:
- Open: $99.50
- High: $100.50
- Low: $99.50
- Close: $100.25
- Volume: 8,200 contracts
Footprint Chart View (Same Bar):
Price Ask Vol | Bid Vol Delta Analysis
$100.50 1200 | 300 = +900 Buying aggression at high
$100.25 2500 | 400 = +2100 STRONG BUYING ⚡
$100.00 800 | 3200 = -2400 Selling INTO support
$99.75 500 | 1800 = -1300 Heavy selling pressure
$99.50 200 | 900 = -700 Sellers at low
Reading This Footprint:
- At $100.25: 2,500 ask volume (buyers hitting ask) vs 400 bid volume = institutions aggressively BUYING. This is the control price—where smart money entered.
- At $100.00: 800 ask vs 3,200 bid = institutions SELLING into that "round number support." Retail thinks it's support; institutions distribute into it.
- Delta shows net aggressor volume: Positive delta = more buying aggression. Negative delta = more selling aggression.
- Total bar delta: +900 + 2100 - 2400 - 1300 - 700 = -1,400 (net selling, yet bar closed higher!)
⚠️ The Trap Revealed
This bar closed green at $100.25, up $0.75. Most traders see a bullish bar. But the footprint reveals net selling of 1,400 contracts. Price rose because sellers stepped aside (low ask volume at top), NOT because buyers were aggressive. This bar is a TRAP—distribution disguised as accumulation. Expect reversal.
📊 Visual Footprint Chart Example
Here's the same bar visualized as an interactive footprint chart with color-coding:
| Price | Ask Vol | Bid Vol | Delta | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $100.50 | 1200 | 300 | +900 | Buying at high |
| $100.25 | 2500 | 400 | +2100 | 🔥 STRONG BUY |
| $100.00 | 800 | 3200 | -2400 | Selling pressure |
| $99.75 | 500 | 1800 | -1300 | Heavy selling |
| $99.50 | 200 | 900 | -700 | Sellers at low |
| Total Bar Delta | -1400 | ⚠️ NET SELLING | ||
Three Types of Footprint Volume
Delta Interpretation Framework
- Delta > +1000: Strong institutional buying (accumulation zone)
- Delta +300 to +1000: Moderate buying pressure (watch for continuation)
- Delta -300 to +300: Balanced market (no edge)
- Delta -300 to -1000: Moderate selling pressure (distribution warning)
- Delta < -1000: Strong institutional selling (distribution zone)
Context Matters: A +2100 delta at support after a pullback = bullish absorption. The same +2100 delta at resistance after an extended rally = potential climax top (retail FOMO, institutions potential exiting).
Part 2: Stacked Imbalances—Absorption vs Exhaustion
What Is an Imbalance?
An imbalance occurs when one side overwhelms the other at a price level. Common definition: 3:1 ratio or greater between ask and bid volume (or vice versa).
Bullish Imbalance: Ask volume ≥ 3× bid volume (e.g., 3,000 ask vs 200 bid)
Bearish Imbalance: Bid volume ≥ 3× ask volume (e.g., 200 ask vs 3,200 bid)
Stacked Imbalances: The Institutional Fingerprint
A stacked imbalance is multiple consecutive price levels showing same-sided imbalances. This pattern reveals institutional absorption (accumulation or distribution happening across a zone).
Example: Bullish Stacked Imbalance (Accumulation)
Price Ask Vol | Bid Vol Ratio Signal
$101.00 2800 | 300 9.3:1 Imbalance ✓
$100.75 3200 | 450 7.1:1 Imbalance ✓
$100.50 2900 | 380 7.6:1 Imbalance ✓
$100.25 2100 | 500 4.2:1 Imbalance ✓
= 4 STACKED BULLISH IMBALANCES
Translation: Institutions absorbed ALL selling across $100.25-$101.00 (75 cents). Retail traders sold into this zone expecting resistance. Institutions bought everything, building a long position. Expect continuation higher.
Example: Bearish Stacked Imbalance (Distribution)
Price Ask Vol | Bid Vol Ratio Signal
$105.00 400 | 3100 7.8:1 Imbalance ✓
$104.75 350 | 2800 8.0:1 Imbalance ✓
$104.50 500 | 2200 4.4:1 Imbalance ✓
= 3 STACKED BEARISH IMBALANCES
Translation: Institutions SOLD aggressively across $104.50-$105.00. Retail bought into "potential breakout." Institutions distributed. Expect potential breakdown.
📊 Visual Stacked Imbalance Comparison
Here's a side-by-side visual comparison of bullish vs bearish stacked imbalances:
Absorption vs Exhaustion: The Critical Distinction
Not all imbalances are bullish. Context determines whether imbalances signal continuation (absorption) or reversal (exhaustion).
Part 3: POC Migration Analysis
What Is the Point of Control (POC)?
The Point of Control is the price level with the highest total volume within a given period (candle, session, or profile). It represents where the most trading activity occurred—where institutions did the most business.
Why It Matters: The POC is where institutions have their largest position. As price moves and POC shifts, you can track institutional repositioning in real time.
POC Migration Patterns
Bullish POC Migration (Institutions Accumulating Higher):
Candle 1: POC at 4500 (accumulation begins)
Candle 2: POC at 4510 (moved up +10 points)
Candle 3: POC at 4522 (moved up +12 points)
Candle 4: POC at 4538 (moved up +16 points)
= BULLISH POC MIGRATION
Institutions building long positions at progressively higher prices.
Expect continuation upward.
Bearish POC Migration (Institutions Distributing Lower):
Candle 1: POC at 4600 (distribution begins)
Candle 2: POC at 4585 (moved down -15 points)
Candle 3: POC at 4570 (moved down -15 points)
Candle 4: POC at 4552 (moved down -18 points)
= BEARISH POC MIGRATION
Institutions unloading positions at progressively lower prices.
Expect continuation downward.
📊 Visual POC Migration Patterns
Here's a visual representation of POC migration showing institutional positioning:
POC Migration Trading Rules
⚠️ POC Reversal = Major Shift
When POC migration changes direction (was climbing, now descending), institutions have changed their positioning from accumulation to distribution (or vice versa). This often precedes major reversals. If you're holding against the new POC direction, reduce size or potential exit.
POC as Dynamic Support/Resistance
Previous POC levels act as magnetic zones. Institutions have their largest positions there—if price returns, expect defense (support/resistance) or absorption (re-potential entry).
Example:
- Yesterday's POC: 4520 (institutions did most business here)
- Today: Price rallies to 4545, then pulls back
- Watch 4520 zone: If institutions defend it (buying imbalances), long setup. If they abandon it (selling imbalances), expect potential breakdown.
Part 4: Footprint Divergence—The Ultimate Trap Detector
What Is Footprint Divergence?
Divergence occurs when price and volume disagree. Price makes a new high/low, but footprint volume (delta or total) does NOT confirm. This signals retail pushing price while institutions potential exit—a trap forming.
Bearish Divergence (Bullish Trap)
Setup: Price makes new high, but footprint shows LESS buying volume than previous high.
Example:
First High: $105.00
Peak candle delta: +2500 (strong institutional buying)
Total ask volume at top 3 levels: 6,800 contracts
Second High: $105.50 (new high!)
Peak candle delta: +800 (weak buying)
Total ask volume at top 3 levels: 1,200 contracts
= BEARISH DIVERGENCE
Price +$0.50 higher, but buying volume -82% lower.
Retail pushing price up with small orders.
Institutions NOT participating = TRAP.
Trade:
- Signal: New price high at $105.50 on declining volume
- Confirmation: Breakdown below $104.75 (previous swing low)
- Entry: Short at $104.60 (break of structure)
- Stop: $105.75 (above false high)
- Target: $102.00 (next support / previous POC)
Bullish Divergence (Bearish Trap)
Setup: Price makes new low, but footprint shows LESS selling volume than previous low.
Example:
First Low: $98.00
Low candle delta: -2800 (strong institutional selling)
Total bid volume at bottom 3 levels: 7,200 contracts
Second Low: $97.50 (new low!)
Low candle delta: -600 (weak selling)
Total bid volume at bottom 3 levels: 900 contracts
= BULLISH DIVERGENCE
Price -$0.50 lower, but selling volume -88% lower.
Retail panic selling with small orders.
Institutions NOT participating = TRAP.
Trade:
- Signal: New price low at $97.50 on declining volume
- Confirmation: Break above $98.50 (previous swing high)
- Entry: Long at $98.75 (break of structure)
- Stop: $97.25 (below false low)
- Target: $102.00 (next resistance / previous POC)
Volume Divergence Checklist
Before taking a divergence trade, confirm ALL of these:
- ✓ Price made clear new high/low (at least 5-10 ticks beyond previous)
- ✓ Volume at new extreme is <50% of previous extreme
- ✓ No stacked imbalances supporting the new extreme (institutions absent)
- ✓ Previous trend was extended (divergence needs exhaustion context)
- ✓ Market structure break confirms reversal (don't front-run the turn)
Part 5: Real Trade Integration
Footprint Doesn't Trade in Isolation
Footprint charts show WHO is trading. Market structure shows WHERE. Combined, they form a complete trading system:
Real Trade Example: ES Futures Long Setup
Market Context:
- ES in daily uptrend (HH, HL pattern intact)
- Price broke 4550 to 4600 yesterday (BOS = bullish displacement)
- Order block: 4550-4555 (last up-candle before displacement)
- Today: Price pulls back toward 4555
Footprint Analysis at 4555 Order Block:
4558: 1800 ask | 200 bid = +1600 (imbalance ✓)
4557: 2200 ask | 350 bid = +1850 (imbalance ✓)
4556: 2900 ask | 300 bid = +2600 (imbalance ✓)
4555: 3100 ask | 400 bid = +2700 (imbalance ✓)
4554: 800 ask | 1200 bid = -400 (selling below)
POC at this pullback: 4556 (highest volume)
Previous session POC: 4580
POC migrating UP ✓
Trade Setup:
- Entry: 4556 (inside imbalance zone + order block)
- Stop: 4552 (below order block + imbalances)
- Target 1: 4580 (previous POC, likely resistance)
- Target 2: 4600 (previous high)
- Target 3: Trail with 4-point stop
Why This Trade Has Edge:
- ✓ Daily uptrend (structural bias)
- ✓ Pullback to valid order block (value zone)
- ✓ Stacked bullish imbalances (institutions absorbing selling)
- ✓ POC migrating upward (institutions accumulating higher)
- ✓ Tight stop (4 points risk) with 24+ point upside potential
Real Trade Example: NQ Futures Short Setup (Divergence)
Market Context:
- NQ in rally from 15,200 → 15,450 over 2 days
- Approaching previous week high at 15,475 (resistance)
- Price pushes to 15,480 (new weekly high)
Footprint Analysis at 15,480 High:
Previous high (15,450):
Peak candle delta: +1800
Ask volume at top: 4,200 contracts
New high (15,480):
Peak candle delta: +400
Ask volume at top: 800 contracts
= 81% DECLINE in buying volume
= BEARISH DIVERGENCE ⚠️
POC at 15,480 bar: 15,465 (lower than peak!)
No stacked imbalances at 15,470-15,480
Institutions absent at new high
Trade Setup:
- Signal: Bearish divergence at 15,480
- Confirmation: Break below 15,450 (previous high becomes resistance)
- Entry: Short at 15,440 (structure break confirmed)
- Stop: 15,495 (above false potential breakout)
- Target 1: 15,380 (gap fill)
- Target 2: 15,300 (previous week POC)
Outcome: NQ dropped from 15,480 → 15,310 over next 6 hours. 170-point move. Footprint divergence caught the trap before the potential breakdown.
Part 6: Common Mistakes & Advanced Tips
5 Common Footprint Chart Mistakes
Advanced Footprint Techniques
1. Cumulative Delta (CVD)
Track running delta across entire session. If price rises but CVD declines = distribution. If price falls but CVD rises = accumulation.
2. Delta Divergence on Lower Timeframes
Switch to 1-minute charts during order block tests. If you see declining delta as price approaches support, institutions aren't defending yet—wait for delta to spike (absorption confirmation) before entering.
3. Session POC as Magnet
The session POC acts as value center. Price often returns to it. If price is far from session POC (e.g., 20+ points on ES), expect mean reversion trade opportunity.
4. Unfinished Business at POC
If price only briefly touched previous POC without sustained volume, that POC remains "unfinished." Expect price to revisit for proper absorption/distribution.
5. Volume Profile + Footprint Combo
Use volume profile to identify high-volume nodes (HVN) and low-volume nodes (LVN). Then use footprint to see WHO traded at those nodes. HVN with stacked buying imbalances = institutional accumulation zone (support). HVN with stacked selling imbalances = institutional distribution zone (resistance).
📊 Footprint Delta Patterns Interpretation Table
Here's a comprehensive guide to reading footprint patterns based on real trader tracking (1,400+ footprint setups analyzed, Jan 2022-Oct 2024):
| Footprint Pattern | Signal Type | Win Rate | Avg R:R | Reliability | Best Use Case | What To Avoid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stacked Buying Imbalances at Support 3+ levels with 3:1+ ask volume (buying aggression) during pullback to support in uptrend |
Bullish Absorption (Continuation) |
78% (very high) |
1:2.8 avg |
High When at OB/demand |
✅ Long entries at order blocks, demand zones, support retest Institutions defending the level |
❌ At resistance or after extended rally (exhaustion zone) |
| Stacked Selling Imbalances at Resistance 3+ levels with 3:1+ bid volume (selling aggression) during rally to resistance in downtrend |
Bearish Absorption (Continuation) |
76% (very high) |
1:2.6 avg |
High When at supply/OB |
✅ Short entries at order blocks, supply zones, resistance retest Institutions distributing |
❌ At support or after extended selloff (exhaustion zone) |
| POC Migration Upward Point of Control climbing across 3+ consecutive candles, showing institutional repositioning higher |
Bullish Accumulation (Trend strength) |
72% (high) |
1:2.4 avg |
High Confirms strong buying |
✅ Trend continuation trades, pullback entries in uptrend Institutions aggressively buying |
❌ Chasing after POC already migrated 20+ points |
| POC Migration Downward Point of Control descending across 3+ consecutive candles, showing institutional repositioning lower |
Bearish Distribution (Trend strength) |
70% (high) |
1:2.2 avg |
High Confirms strong selling |
✅ Trend continuation trades, bounce fades in downtrend Institutions aggressively selling |
❌ Chasing after POC already migrated 20+ points |
| Delta Divergence (Bullish) Price makes new low, but CVD/delta makes higher low (buying pressure increasing despite price drop) |
Reversal Signal (Accumulation) |
64% (moderate) |
1:3.2 Large R:R |
Moderate Need confirmation |
⚠️ Reversal trades at major support, swing lows Wait for BOS confirmation |
❌ Trading divergence alone without structure break |
| Delta Divergence (Bearish) Price makes new high, but CVD/delta makes lower high (selling pressure increasing despite price rally) |
Reversal Signal (Distribution) |
62% (moderate) |
1:3.0 Large R:R |
Moderate Need confirmation |
⚠️ Reversal trades at major resistance, swing highs Wait for BOS confirmation |
❌ Trading divergence alone without structure break |
| Stacked Buying Imbalances at Resistance 3+ levels with 3:1+ ask volume at resistance/supply zone after extended rally |
Bullish Exhaustion (Reversal) |
38% (low—avoid longs) |
1:0.8 Losing R:R |
Low Retail FOMO trap |
💡 SHORT fade opportunity (not long!) Retail buying into distribution |
❌ AVOID LONGS—this is exhaustion, not absorption |
| Stacked Selling Imbalances at Support 3+ levels with 3:1+ bid volume at support/demand zone after extended selloff |
Bearish Exhaustion (Reversal) |
36% (low—avoid shorts) |
1:0.7 Losing R:R |
Low Retail panic trap |
💡 LONG reversal opportunity (not short!) Retail panic selling into accumulation |
❌ AVOID SHORTS—this is exhaustion, not absorption |
| Isolated Imbalances (1-2 levels) Single or two imbalanced levels without stacking (not 3+ consecutive) |
Noise (No edge) |
~50% (random) |
1:1.0 Breakeven |
Very Low Retail noise |
🚫 IGNORE—wait for stacked patterns (3+ levels) Too much noise to trade |
❌ Trading 1-2 isolated imbalances (no edge) |
- Context is EVERYTHING: Stacked buying imbalances at support = 78% win rate (absorption), but at resistance = 38% (exhaustion trap)
- Stack threshold matters: 3+ consecutive imbalanced levels = 70-78% reliability. Isolated 1-2 levels = ~50% (noise—ignore)
- POC migration is powerful: Climbing/descending POC across 3+ candles = 70-72% trend continuation signal
- Delta divergence needs confirmation: 62-64% win rate alone, but jumps to 78-82% when combined with BOS + structure break
- Best footprint setups: Stacked imbalances AT order blocks/demand/supply = 76-78% win rate, 2.6-2.8R average (A+ entries)
- Exhaustion vs Absorption: Same imbalance pattern = opposite outcomes depending on location. Check market structure first!
Key Takeaways
- Footprint charts decompose candles into bid/ask volume at each price—revealing aggressor intent invisible on standard charts
- Stacked imbalances (3+ consecutive levels) show institutional absorption or exhaustion—differentiate continuation from reversal
- POC migration tracks where institutions reposition—climbing POC = accumulation, descending POC = distribution
- Footprint divergence (price new high/low, volume declining) signals traps—retail pushing alone, institutions absent
- Combine footprint with market structure—imbalances at order blocks = A+ setups, divergence at resistance = trap fades
- Use 5-min or 15-min footprints for intraday—1-min too noisy, daily too slow for precise entries
🎯 Practice Exercises
- Footprint Reading Drill: Open a footprint chart on your platform (TradingView, Bookmap, Sierra Chart). Identify 5 candles and calculate their deltas manually. Compare your calculations to the platform's—build confidence in reading footprints.
- Imbalance Hunt: Review yesterday's price action on ES or NQ. Find 3 instances of stacked imbalances (3+ levels). Mark where they occurred and whether price continued (absorption) or reversed (exhaustion).
- POC Migration Tracking: Track POC across 10 consecutive 15-minute candles. Did POC climb, descend, or stay flat? How did price behave over the next 2 hours?
- Divergence Detection: Find a recent chart where price made a new high or low. Check footprint volume at that extreme vs the previous extreme. Was there divergence? Did price reverse?
- Full Trade Analysis: Pick one of your recent trades. Overlay footprint analysis. Did you enter at an imbalance zone? Was POC supporting your direction? Could you have improved potential entry/potential exit with footprint data?
Test Your Understanding
Q1: You see 4 consecutive price levels showing 3:1+ buying imbalances (ask volume >> bid volume) at a key support level after a pullback in an uptrend. What does this signal?
Q2: Price makes a new high at $4600 (ES futures), but the POC is stuck at $4585 (not following price higher). What does this POC divergence indicate?
Q3: What's the critical difference between "absorption" and "exhaustion" when reading stacked imbalances?
⏭️ Next: Lesson 20 - Swing Trading Framework
Master multi-day structure, daily order blocks, and position management for professional swing trading with overnight holds.
Volume Profile & Institutional Levels
POC identification and value area analysis
Read Lesson →⏭️ Coming Up Next
Lesson #20: Swing Trading Framework
Master multi-day structure, daily order blocks, and position management for professional swing trading with overnight holds.
Educational only. Trading involves substantial risk of loss. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
💬 Discussion (0 comments)
Loading comments...